T-groups and groups for meetings as a form of psychotherapy

T groups and meetings
T-groups appear in the summer of 1946g.kato result of an interesting discovery during a seminar on intergroup otnoshenie.Kurt Levin heads the research team in action.
At the end of the workshop session to check the results four leaders reshtavat that the procedure of using the group process as a target for the use of the group's own development and take deistviya is an important finding that needs research and razrabotvane.Sazdatelite these groups distinguished group therapy T - grupata.Prez 50 years practitioners from various fields adapted T-group to own distsiplina.Drugi interested in small groups to work "face to face" Various experiments are trying to adapt the process T-groups to work on natural working grupi.Poyavyavat new topics -temite for resistance and doverieto.Postignati are many successes, but also some failures.
In the 60s and 70s of the 20th century movement for personal izrastavane trying to adapt the T-group h sebeizsledvaneto.Tova purposes of development completely deviates from parvonayaalnata orientation of the T-group t.e.da study group dynamics ./ processes that occur group /.
In the 80s revived interest in the idea of Levin that the small group is the link between the larger system and the individual.

T-groups / groups training in human relations / is based on the idea that one can most effectively be changed when in a group. Used to solve a variety of tasks: gaining knowledge and experience in interpersonal relations, discuss new problems, acquiring skills, developing self-awareness and change attitudes in life. Basic postulate is experiential learning experience and the role of human assistance. T-groups are educational rather than therapeutic in nature and therefore are aimed at helping clients norm. The facilitator does not intervene in the group process, even if it finds that stagnant or unproductive. Allowed the submission of new material diskusiiya or making notes in the event of communication problems. At home more often held meetings for groups / or groups here call them for talks /. Differences between groups for meetings and m-groups is rather arbitrary. Some authors identify them because of their close goals and similar conduct. They consider the concept of "group meeting" as summarizing. They are rather diverse in the general context of personal support and can be formulated in the broader deapazon of self-knowledge to social fuktsionirane. It is important to note that the groups meetings interpersonal relationships are considered not so much as subject to change as a tool for change. Basis of group activity is communication which creates conditions for monitoring, self-awareness, support, display of responsibility, feelings, conflict and avoidable resistance. / Example to change for fear of her / groups meetings successful alternative to traditional psychotherapeutic effects especially for customers who have difficulty in communicating in adaptiranetoi and achieve intimacy with others. Some people are not suitable for inclusion in this group. These are people with overt aggression, striving for dominance, which can transform the group into a place for the manifestation of self-centered desires. The group is not an appropriate form and tvardse oppressed and disadvantaged clients, which are difficult to resist peer pressure and possible deeper problems. It should be noted the possibility of a breach of confidentiality, which is a peremptory norm as in individual counseling and in group work.
Such selection is again rarely done in DVHFU reasons outlined above, the objectives are achieved to a great extent due to the nerves of the lead :).
Optimum / best / in terms of the result to set up a group of 8-12 people in the presence of two lead. Therefore DVHFU groups are formed by 5-6 people most often. Even though I am self-trained students in groups of maximum number - 12 persons.